Jump to content


Photo

Question For Anyone Who Has Used Vinmetrica Sc300

TA

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 kakeeler

kakeeler

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Paso Robles, CA
  • Interests:Wine, grape growing, olive growing, olive oil making, general farming.

Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:52 PM

Hi all,

We got the Vinmetrica SC300 to try to keep better track of our numbers. It arrived this week, and we had sent some samples in for testing, so we thought this would be a good time to try it, since we'd have lab numbers to which we could compare them. The pH numbers were very close to the lab's. In fact, one number was dead-on.

The TA's were all significantly off of the lab numbers, though. For instance, the lab number of our Cab TA was .65. On the Vinmetrica, it came back as .56. We checked our measurements, recalibrated, used clean instruments, we're as exact as is possible, but those numbers keep coming back way off.

We watched the videos over and over; we've read the manual; we just can't figure out what is off.

Does anyone have any tips as to something they might have run into? Thanks for anything we could try. We're exasperated -- and yes, I'll call the company Monday, but it's Saturday night, and I really wanted this to work. Everyone else has had good luck.

Thanks!

K

#2 mokadir

mokadir

    Cellar Junkie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2898 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Delaware Valley, PA

Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:54 PM

Is your NaOH solution standardized and/or fresh?
Bob
AGING: 2012 Chardonnay Champagne. AWAITING BARREL: Inlaws CV Zin, Lake County Montepulciano and Zin
BARRELING: FO/AO - Yakima Valley Pinot Noir 12, CS and Merlot 11, HO - CV Rhone blend 11
Freshly bottled: Chilean Carmenere "Bordeaux" blend 2010

#3 kakeeler

kakeeler

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Paso Robles, CA
  • Interests:Wine, grape growing, olive growing, olive oil making, general farming.

Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:24 PM

We got new solution with the machine, so it s/be fresh and standardized, although I will confirm that again on Monday -- doesn't hurt to ask!

#4 PEL

PEL

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 635 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brunswick, Maryland
  • Interests:Viticulture, wine making

Posted 10 June 2012 - 05:13 AM

Hi all,

We got the Vinmetrica SC300 to try to keep better track of our numbers. It arrived this week, and we had sent some samples in for testing, so we thought this would be a good time to try it, since we'd have lab numbers to which we could compare them. The pH numbers were very close to the lab's. In fact, one number was dead-on.

The TA's were all significantly off of the lab numbers, though. For instance, the lab number of our Cab TA was .65. On the Vinmetrica, it came back as .56. We checked our measurements, recalibrated, used clean instruments, we're as exact as is possible, but those numbers keep coming back way off.

We watched the videos over and over; we've read the manual; we just can't figure out what is off.

Does anyone have any tips as to something they might have run into? Thanks for anything we could try. We're exasperated -- and yes, I'll call the company Monday, but it's Saturday night, and I really wanted this to work. Everyone else has had good luck.

Thanks!

K

My guess is that if you sent three seperate samples of the wine to the same lab, the numbers would not agree exactly and in fact might be close to the range you gave. Don't know for sure but just guessing.

#5 kakeeler

kakeeler

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Paso Robles, CA
  • Interests:Wine, grape growing, olive growing, olive oil making, general farming.

Posted 10 June 2012 - 03:46 PM

I'm going to do them again, now that I've cleared my mind. Maybe we tried to do too many things late in the day and we were just missing a big, major thing. The pH went fine. The TA just was way off. Hopefully, it will go better this time. Thanks!

#6 gregorio

gregorio

    Wino In Training

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12049 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Gatos, CA

Posted 10 June 2012 - 04:09 PM

My guess is that if you sent three seperate samples of the wine to the same lab, the numbers would not agree exactly and in fact might be close to the range you gave. Don't know for sure but just guessing.


If that happens, you need to go to a new lab.
Perrucci Family Wines by Kennedy Hill Vineyards. Contact us regarding our monthly cork group buys.

#7 kakeeler

kakeeler

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Paso Robles, CA
  • Interests:Wine, grape growing, olive growing, olive oil making, general farming.

Posted 14 June 2012 - 09:26 PM

We focused on it fresh the next day and got to within.01 of the lab's numbers on the pH, the TA, and the SO2. We're going to get more precise ureters and better beakers and run mirror tests until we're feeling confident. Bottom line is that it works; we're the problem.

#8 Doyle

Doyle

    Look Out Ernest & Julio

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3746 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunnyvale, CA
  • Interests:Winemaking, Home Theater, RC Planes, Ham Radio, Solar Electric

Posted 15 June 2012 - 10:16 AM

The NaOH solution that the Vinmetrica uses is 0.133 N. This is a non standard solution in that you cannot go over to Vintners Vault or another local shop and purchase this concentration of NaOH. The value was chosen because it makes the TA calculation very easy when you use the 5 ml sample. Essentially it is 2 times the volume of 0.133N titrant.
One of the issues with NaOH is that it degrades in concentration with time once the bottle has been opened.
I mention this so that you don't try to keep this for a year and use it. You should probably purchase fresh titrant at the beginning of each harvest season.
The alternative is to purchase fresh NaOH of a standard concentration and do the slightly more involved math. ) 0.1N and 0.2N are pretty common. The math is described in the manual and you would just replace the 0.133 number with whatever your new concentration is.

#9 kakeeler

kakeeler

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Paso Robles, CA
  • Interests:Wine, grape growing, olive growing, olive oil making, general farming.

Posted 24 June 2012 - 05:21 PM

Thank you so much for that info. It's really handy to have, so I don't go try to buy it at Vintner's Vault. I spent a lot of time on it today and have a much better understanding of the whole process. I'm going to continue to run mirror lab tests for a bit, and hopefully, I'll become more confident and be able to fly solo on my lab work.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users