Jump to content


Photo

Which Ph Meter That I Will Hate The Least


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Ticino Vintner

Ticino Vintner

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 214 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ticino, Switzerland
  • Interests:Outdoors in the Alps or the vineyard.

Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:17 AM

So I have done many searches, read many reviews and it seems that no matter what ph meter I buy it will live all the way to its inevitable fate of laying on the floor broken in a hundred pieces. From what I have read it does not matter if I spend $50 or $300 they all suck the same. So I set my budget at the $50-$100 range considering I may have to replace it every year or two. So I would like to ask all of you which PH meter will piss me off the least while lasting the longest without spending a fortune?

This will be for fresh grape winemaking.
Organic old vine Merlot, CabSauv and Bondola grower since just the other day.

#2 fmestas

fmestas

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 878 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM, Elevation: 5000 ft, GDD: 3600

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:03 AM

Extech pH110! After going through about 4 other meters from Milwaukee, Hanna etc. all with quality issues, I finally purchased the Extech about 4-5 years ago. Haven't had a problem since. It calibrates much more easily and quickly than the others and thanks to the re-fillable buffer solution it maintains the calibration for longer. It's slightly higher than the price range you indicated, but I think it's worth it.
Frank Mestas

www.elsranxos.com

"The absence of defects is not the presence of virtues" - Sean Thackrey

#3 Tom NW

Tom NW

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Woodworking and winemaking

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:13 AM

Last year I got a Hanna 2210 bench top. I had similar frustrations with hand held models that you imply. The biggest change I noticed in my readings was getting a magnetic stirrer. Without the stirrer running, I tend to have a little drift. Since I started using a stirrer my readings stay constant. It was not an expensive stirrer either. My kids found it online from a guy in the mid-west that makes it for beer ferments. I think it was around $35.

#4 Joe_Sallo

Joe_Sallo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 743 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA, Pgh, PA

Posted 22 April 2012 - 11:31 AM

I have one of the first Hanna pHeP5's they made it has to be at least 8 years old. It's on it's second probe but they are replaceable. I like it, it's accurate enough for wine or beer and it's worth what I paid for it. I use Hydrion buffer capsules to calibrate, that's the cheapest way to calibrate an inexpensive meter.

#5 Ticino Vintner

Ticino Vintner

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 214 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ticino, Switzerland
  • Interests:Outdoors in the Alps or the vineyard.

Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:39 PM

Extech pH110! After going through about 4 other meters from Milwaukee, Hanna etc. all with quality issues, I finally purchased the Extech about 4-5 years ago. Haven't had a problem since. It calibrates much more easily and quickly than the others and thanks to the re-fillable buffer solution it maintains the calibration for longer. It's slightly higher than the price range you indicated, but I think it's worth it.


That was actually one I was considering. I just want something that is hassle free, easy to maintain and has an accuracy of somewhere in the ballpark.
Organic old vine Merlot, CabSauv and Bondola grower since just the other day.

#6 Tomer1

Tomer1

    Look Out Ernest & Julio

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Israel
  • Interests:Music writing\production, cooking, cheesemaking, winemaking, piano playing, sound design.

Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:21 PM

Ph100 or 110. Accurate and reliable. Keep the electrode wet in storage solution and recalibrate before testing.
My advice may or may not be backed by actually personal expirience and should be treated as such. :)

#7 BobF

BobF

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 417 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:southcentral MO

Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:22 PM

I'm perfectly happy with my MW102 ...

#8 poni

poni

    Look Out Ernest & Julio

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1255 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Freedom! PA
  • Interests:My Wine-garden, drums, pizza making, comics and The Batman...

Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:26 PM

i got this one http://www.waterfiltersonline.com/detail.asp?product_id=hmi-ph-200
No problems, and haven't had to change the electrode in 2 yrs! It snaps to the pH measurement right quick! so far so good!

#9 Calamity Cellars

Calamity Cellars

    Current WinePress Donor

  • WinePress.US Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3003 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Burlington, WA

Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:52 PM

http://valleyvintner...ategory_Code=pH
Bought one of these in 2009 and have had zero problems and loved it. Earlier this year I thought I needed a new probe so I ordered one but then found out it was bad buffer solutions. This is the best value in high quality pH meters out there...there is a reason it is sold out.

Alan Holtzheimer


Silver Bell Winery


#10 rawlus

rawlus

    Advanced Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 564 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:milford, ma

Posted 23 April 2012 - 08:12 AM

I use a Hach H-Series H138 minlab ISFET pH meter, best purchase I ever made. There are a few manufacturers making the solid state ISFET type meters. Rather than a bulb that must remain wet and deteriorates over time, ISFET uses a microchip and a contained reference liquid.

Best aspects for me:
Small and portable, I can carry the meter and 3 calibration reference solutions in a small package
Can be stored dry indefinitely
Requires only a drop-sized sample, like a refractometer
Self-calibrating and supports maybe a half-dozen or so reference standards
My own results have been very consistent and repeatable. Something that I did not always get with traditional type pH meters, I questioned the accuracy of my measurements because results were always sometimes inconsistent or it repeatable, drawing all results into question.

Hach has a few of the h-series, the 138 is the most accurate but the other two lower priced units should still deliver good service.



#11 Wade's Wines

Wade's Wines

    Colonel Wade, Bottle Brigade, 3rd Glass

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 14126 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tennessee, 70mi. South of Nashville
  • Interests:Winemaking
    Auctioneering
    Woodcarving
    Brewing
    Kayaking

Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:09 AM

Just looked up the Hach H138 pH meter. Very cool! More than 2x the price I paid for my benchtop model, but with a dry-storage probe, pocket size and durable I'll bet it's worth the difference. Maybe when my benchtop dies....
Mine's easy to use, but this sounds much easier and uses less wine or juice by far.
Tennessee Auctioneer, makin' wines and growin' vines!
The Best of Times is Now! :0)

#12 bret

bret

    Hesed Vineyards

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2203 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Benkelman, Nebraska 69021
  • Interests:Reading the Bible. Tending vineyard. Making wine. Playing w/my English Bulldogs. Practicing medicine.

Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:30 PM

http://valleyvintner...ategory_Code=pH
Bought one of these in 2009 and have had zero problems and loved it. Earlier this year I thought I needed a new probe so I ordered one but then found out it was bad buffer solutions. This is the best value in high quality pH meters out there...there is a reason it is sold out.



I have the same one, and I'm happy with it. I also have the "mini stirrer", also sold by Valley Vintner, and I think using that makes a big difference, at least with titrations.

-Bret
Bret A. Moore, Southwest Nebraska

#13 Ticino Vintner

Ticino Vintner

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 214 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ticino, Switzerland
  • Interests:Outdoors in the Alps or the vineyard.

Posted 03 May 2012 - 04:36 AM

Thanks for all the recommendations, I am still undecided but I have a few months before I really need a ph meter so that will give me time to see if I might find one on sale.
Organic old vine Merlot, CabSauv and Bondola grower since just the other day.

#14 Ticino Vintner

Ticino Vintner

    Veteran Wine Maker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 214 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ticino, Switzerland
  • Interests:Outdoors in the Alps or the vineyard.

Posted 09 May 2012 - 10:26 AM

I was just about to buy the Oakton PH2 when I decided to go to youtube and check if there are any videos of the PH2 and the Extech PH110.
I liked what I saw from the PH2 even though most of them where coming from "medicinal herbal" growers, then I saw the Extech video of them just sticking the meter right in the ground to get a PH reading of the soil. Sah-Weeeet! I know, I know, there are other ways to use normal PH meters to test soil but that includes more testing equip (glass jar) and a few extra procedures. All of which I dont care for, the ability to not only test my wine with amazing accuracy but also my soil had me sold. I pulled the trigger and am now an Extech PH110 owner. I cant wait for it to arrive and test it out in the vineyard.



Organic old vine Merlot, CabSauv and Bondola grower since just the other day.

#15 mokadir

mokadir

    Cellar Junkie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2903 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Delaware Valley, PA

Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:44 PM

I have the Hach ISFET type also, about 5 yrs old, similar to the newer H138. Very reliable, though I did have to replace the reference electrode after about 3 years.
Bob
AGING: 2012 Chardonnay Champagne. AWAITING BARREL: Inlaws CV Zin, Lake County Montepulciano and Zin
BARRELING: FO/AO - Yakima Valley Pinot Noir 12, CS and Merlot 11, HO - CV Rhone blend 11
Freshly bottled: Chilean Carmenere "Bordeaux" blend 2010




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users