Sugar Vs. Honey
#1
Posted 03 March 2011 - 06:52 PM
or
vice versa ?
#2
Posted 03 March 2011 - 07:08 PM
Actually call me anything you want
Just don't call me late for supper
#3
Posted 03 March 2011 - 07:12 PM
Amateur Winemakers Of Louisville: http://www.facebook....37454883025144/
#4
Posted 03 March 2011 - 07:21 PM
Actually call me anything you want
Just don't call me late for supper
#5
Posted 03 March 2011 - 09:02 PM
If you ever run short on honey for a recipe... just add sugar to make up the difference. I've got some recipes that call for some of each and you can definitely taste the honey notes in it.
Debbie
#61 Blueberry #60 Mixed berry #59 Niagara #58 Moscato #57 Piesporter- kit #56 Raspberry Melomel #55 Rhubarb
#54 White Grape/Peach #53 Elder Pee #52 Elderberry #51 Black Currant Pee #50 Black Currant #49 Elderflower
#47 Dandelion #46 ELDER PEE #45 Elderberry (seconds)
#6
Posted 03 March 2011 - 10:00 PM
Do like deb says and use your hydrometer instead
#7
Posted 04 March 2011 - 09:18 AM
I want to replace the sugar with honey.
I would like it to be between semi sweet to sweet.
How much honey do I use & what other changes do I need to make ?
Jam or Jelly Wine (Strawberry, Peach, Blackberry, Plum, Raspberry) WineThief
1 gallon 3-lbs Jelly or Jam any flavor 1-lb Sugar 6-7 Pints of water 2-tsp Acid Blend 1/8-tsp Tannin 1-tsp Nutrient 1-tsp Pectic Enzyme 1- Premier Cuvee Wine Yeast Scoop Jelly or Jam into your primary fermentor. Dissolve sugar in 2 pints of boiling water, remove from heat and add 3 pints of cool water to sugar water to cool, then add to primary. (Do not pour the boiling water directly into the jam, be sure to mix with cool water first) Stir in enough Cool Water to make one US Gallon in primary - make sure all lumps are dissolved. Stir in Acid Blend, Tannin, Nutrient and Pectic Enzyme. Check that the temperature is near 70 degrees, if not allow to cool. Test to confirm Starting SG of 1.095 - 1.100 Adjust if necessary. Add yeast. Ferment for 3-5 days. When SG reaches 1.030 transfer/siphon into glass carboy (secondary), attach bung and airlock. Leave for approx. 3 weeks, SG should be at or below 1.000, transfer again. Leave for approx. 2 months, transfer again this time adding 1 campden tablet. Transfer again in 2 months and again in 2 months if necessary. Bottle when clear. Can be sweetened at bottling by adding 1/2 tsp stabilizer and 1/4 lb dissolved Sugar per gallon.
#8
Posted 04 March 2011 - 12:56 PM
Actually call me anything you want
Just don't call me late for supper
#9
Posted 04 March 2011 - 01:18 PM
Now we have tools and we should use them, but I don't like adding stuff to my wine. Least not chemicals...
To make a sweet wine I go ahead and start with a SG of 1.100, and as it begins to dry out I keep feeding it sugar as one does slowly to boost alcohol, until finally the yeast gives in. Then I sweeten to whatever sweetness I desire. Wines typically dry out to 15% depending on yeast strain obviously, and it makes for a very sharp young wine. But with age there is zero chance of sorbate vegginess, and the wine is capable of reaching fine old ages not possible with sorbets. And despite the high alcohol, the age provides a mellowness with still the hint of drinking wine rather than drinking something from a dusty old bottle.
#10
Posted 05 March 2011 - 01:15 AM
So yes, to replace sugar with honey you must use a hydrometer.
Rick.
#11
Posted 05 March 2011 - 07:43 AM
I very much dislike adding anything to my wines, too. I am not sure I have done what you did here, though. I don't think I have ever made a sweeter wine, sugar fed it to kill yeast, and then put it away without sorbate. The closest I ever came was with the CRP kit. That required sugar dosing. Do you use potassium metabisulfate then? I would be much appreciative if you could elaborate on your process. I would like to try an experiment out with the process.
Well I have a different perspective of how to produce sweet wines. Winemakers historically didn't have sorbates to kill yeast reproduction, so how did they make wine sweet? As well they didn't really have an indication of sugar or alcohol content using refractometers, spectrometers or even hydrometers. They used their taste buds.
Now we have tools and we should use them, but I don't like adding stuff to my wine. Least not chemicals...
To make a sweet wine I go ahead and start with a SG of 1.100, and as it begins to dry out I keep feeding it sugar as one does slowly to boost alcohol, until finally the yeast gives in. Then I sweeten to whatever sweetness I desire. Wines typically dry out to 15% depending on yeast strain obviously, and it makes for a very sharp young wine. But with age there is zero chance of sorbate vegginess, and the wine is capable of reaching fine old ages not possible with sorbets. And despite the high alcohol, the age provides a mellowness with still the hint of drinking wine rather than drinking something from a dusty old bottle.
#12
Posted 05 March 2011 - 10:04 AM
I generally use champagne yeast because it will subdue other yeasts and some bacterias, and thus helps with being more sulfate free. It also drops cleanly out of the wine, so there is much less chance of a yeast restarting in the bottle...which honestly is really rare anyway if the alcohol is higher than 12.3% anyway. Yes it _can_ happen, but the yeast generally don't want to even bother trying to multiply in a finished wine. Sorbate doesn't Eliminate this possibility either, it only reduces the chances so why do it? Just boost you alcohol until the yeast give...doesn't matter which you use so long as the yeast doesn't give up below 12.3%. Most of my wine hover around 15% alcohol by feeding the way I do, then can sweeten to taste.
#13
Posted 09 March 2011 - 10:56 AM
You taste buds are woefully inadequate to determine gravity. Depending on tannins and acids present, your perception of sweetness will be all over the map. Even in the days of yore, folks found a way to measure gravity, such as increasing the sugar content until a fresh egg would float. That is much more reproducible that going by taste.
And definitely watch out for those chemical in your mead!
That That C2H5OH is terribly toxic, especially to liver, brain and heart cells.
Also, the C6H12O6 is really bad for you. It will even cause your teeth to rot.
And that H2O stuff can kill you if it gets in your lungs.
So beware of those pesky chemicals.
(Past years are always better)
#14
Posted 08 October 2011 - 05:39 PM
You had me going with the watch out for those pesky chemicals for a minute until i read back over them and realized what they were....NiceAnd definitely watch out for those chemical in your mead!
That That C2H5OH is terribly toxic, especially to liver, brain and heart cells.
Also, the C6H12O6 is really bad for you. It will even cause your teeth to rot.
And that H2O stuff can kill you if it gets in your lungs.
So beware of those pesky chemicals.
#15
Posted 13 November 2011 - 06:01 PM
I will say, having made several jam wines, there have been many batches that didn't even need additional sugar added...the jam was so sugar laden. Outcome, really good wines so far, and I imagine they will only get better with aging.
Amateur Winemakers Of Louisville: http://www.facebook....37454883025144/
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















