Looking For A First Corker
#1
Posted 02 March 2008 - 10:38 AM
#2
Posted 02 March 2008 - 10:58 AM
"WINE IS A CONSTANT REMINDER THAT GOD LOVES US AND LOVES TO SEE US HAPPY"
Terry Neve
#3
Posted 02 March 2008 - 11:14 AM
I might get an italian one which are about a hundred bucks or so but mostly because I am pretty tall .
Z
Zac Brown
#4
Posted 02 March 2008 - 11:46 AM
Happy Winemaking
John Z
#5
Posted 02 March 2008 - 01:19 PM
I might get an italian one which are about a hundred bucks or so but mostly because I am pretty tall .
Z
Thanks guys for the info so far...bzac, do you have a name and model of the floor corker you have?
#6
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:52 PM
#7
Posted 02 March 2008 - 08:55 PM
Dance like no one is watching and live like there is no tomorrow !!
#8
Posted 02 March 2008 - 09:20 PM
I'm not sure why you would say that. I've used my red Portuguese corker for over seven years now on an estimated 2000-3000 bottles, and have never, ever had a single problem with it.
But I think either corker would be a good investment.
Steve Kroll
President, Purple Foot Winemaking Club
"41 Years of Fine Winemaking"
www.purplefoot.org
Wine a little... and you'll feel much better!
#9
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:10 AM
I might get an italian one which are about a hundred bucks or so but mostly because I am pretty tall .
Z
Zac, I got an Italian Floor Corker knockoff 2 years ago for $39.95 in Hemmingford at a little country store. Even with VAT added along with out US dollar, it was under $40. I don't remember the name of the store though. Someone else told us of the store. It's a little store with limited supplies, but you sure can't beat that price. It is very close to the more expensive ones and I have had no problems with it. The iris is even brass. One thing is the slightly shorter handle, but it still takes very little effort to operate.
The Portugese corkers work well as well like others have said.
#10
Posted 03 March 2008 - 05:54 AM
#11
Posted 03 March 2008 - 06:15 AM
But I think either corker would be a good investment.
Steve, the reason I say this is due to the ease of corking with the Italian (Ferrari) compared to the Portugese. Yes, the Portuguese did the trick even though it left indents in my synthetic corks, but it was more difficult to insert the cork. With the Ferrari, a child could do it. Smooth. As Bzac pointed out, the height makes it nice too.
Merilyn
Dance like no one is watching and live like there is no tomorrow !!
#12
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:07 AM
#13
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:47 AM
put it this way a hand corker at my lhbs is 25$ , a Portuguese is 44$ and the Italians are 89$ to 110$
for the money the Portuguese is the best value for money (and the hand corker is only good for landfill, total waste of money) . and if you are only doing 5 -10 kits a year , and on a budget probably the way to go. I am happy with mine and several thousands bottles later it still works as good as the day I bought it.
but for taller folks& those who need the extra leverage or those who are doing 700- 1000 bottles a year plus.
the Italian ones are worth it.
I am looking at the Italian ones because when I am bottling I use an enolmatic and my Portuguese and alone I can do 120- 130 bottles an hour with that set up , but because I am over six foot tall and the Portuguese is short I get a sore shoulder and back from stooping over during marathon bottling sessions. the Italian being 6 inches taller and having a longer handle is a big plus. they also have a longer range of bottles they fit , doing splits easier than on my Portuguese I have to put a piece of a 2X4 under the bottles when doing splits.
Z
Zac Brown
#14
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:53 AM
#15
Posted 03 March 2008 - 09:08 AM
I think I paid $80 or $90 at my local home brew store.
I'm sure the Portuguese is very similar, as this has been talked about several times.
Either is worth the extra $20 over your budget, your bottling experience will be exponentially more pleasant.
I got a feeva, and the only prescription is more carboys.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















